Friday, June 5, 2009

the experience of airlines, before you get anywhere near the airport

I stumbled across this guy, who designs websites, and got so angry with his poor experience on the American Airlines website, he critiqued it, redesigned it, and sent them a letter about it. He's a smart guy - he rightly points out that we're at the point with marketing and technology that a poor website design, that does not provide for easy navigation, usability, and sale of services, is beyond useless, but detrimental to a company; it not only limits revenue possibility, but damages the brand.

As a part of my job at the NCTA, I book airline travel for our contract staff, up to 70 flights for a single event. Airlines prices are way down this season - fewer people are traveling for vacation, fewer companies can afford to have employees travel for business. It's not a good time to be an airline.

Curtis points out that "new, young, and innovative" airlines like JetBlue and Virgin America gain repeat business and thus market share by providing an "excellent customer experience."

What is the excellent customer experience? I might argue that once you're at the check in counter, and especially once you're on the plane, the service is all about the same. All the airlines pass out peanuts, and have equally educated pilots and polite attendants - no real difference there. The airline's only real chance to differentiate themselves is before you're provided the service - when you're making the ticket purchase, that is, when you're on the website. They differentiate themselves by how difficult or easy they make this process, and the emotions they inspire when the traveler is making a reservation. Do they feel calm and confident? Or stressed; bogged down with tedious search functions, nebulous options, and unclear pricing? This experience of booking a ticket may turn a consumer totally on, or totally off, to your brand (exactly as Curtis claimed it did for him). And consumers are both emotional and loyal - once they don't get a good feeling from your brand, or don't connect with it as a part of their identity, they'll quickly develop a disdain for it, and probably tell all their friends to do the same.

Who knew we'd come to a point where the actual product we're paying for is all homogeneous. It's the high or low quality of the free experience we get beforehand that determines which brand we prefer. This isn't always true - quality of actual experience certainly counts...sometimes. But more often, it's all in the packaging; the feeling we get when engaging with the company's image.

3 comments:

  1. 1. Most of the airlines neglect their website because sales are driven through 3rd party sites like Orbitz and Priceline.

    2. All service is the same, across airlines, because air travel has turned into a commodity--everyone books by price. Would you be willing to choose American over Delta, paying an extra $50 for better service? Probably not.

    3. Dustin misses the point with American--their website stinks because it is a huge corporation with multiple stakeholders, and a makeover would be an immense expense. A reply from the AA web designer confirms this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1. Hmm...maybe true? A couple exceptions: 1) for business travel (that I book) my org has me do it through the direct site, because they're more flexible on change policies - I wonder if other businesses do this. 2) Airlines are still trying to build loyalty, through frequent flyer programs, and "member sales! price wars!" as evidenced by the emails I get to my inbox that, with one click, direct me straight to their website. The hip airlines have even released widgets for your mac dashboard, alerting you to sales, that, with the same one click, send you straight to their website. For both of these reasons, and I'm sure many more you could think of, airlines shouldn't neglect their websites just because Orbitz is there to do some of the search grunt work.

    2. Agreed.

    3. Yes, the AA rep confirms that. But there are other huge corporations with many stakeholders, that have cleaner, more user-friendly websites. Most places don't use the excuse, "we're huge, so excuse our poor usability." Get it together, you know?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Please. Get it together. [sounds better in a midwestern accent, or by Eric faking a midwestern accent.]

    MISS YOU. Still in love with your blog. Call me back!
    -Michelle

    ReplyDelete